Psaki’s Alternative Facts: How The Georgia Election Law Became Part of Our Choice Political Reality

For decades, the press shredded Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway to get a statement on Meet The Press meeting on January 22, 2017, in which she defended White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer on attendance numbers in the inauguration. Conway insisted that, although Chuck Todd was mentioning one set of numbers, Spicer was giving”alternative details”. The announcement generated a firestorm of ridicule that the Trump White House has been constructing another reality. That’s not the response however into this ongoing misrepresentations of the Georgia election law by President Joe Biden — fictitious statements criticized by the Washington Post.  Additionally there was little response this week once Press Secretary Jen Psaki defended the other facts presented the White House and some media outletsafter another significant newspaper called out the exact false statements about the law.
During a meeting on ESPN,” Biden repeated his claim that the legislation is”Jim Crow on steroids” and added:”Imagine passing a law saying you can’t provide water or food for somebody standing in line to vote, can’t do so? C’mon! Or you’re likely to close a polling place in 5 o’clock when working folks just get off”
As we previously discussed, it’s hard to”envision” because it isn’t true and the White House knows that it isn’t true.   I won’t replicate the definitely false claim about closing polling places early.  Since the Washington Post noted,”the net impact [of this Georgia law] would be… to enlarge the chances to vote for most Georgians, not limit them.”  The usage of this provision to indicate a reduction in voting hours has been a knowing misrepresentation by those trying to warrant the federalization of election legislation in Congress.  Despite being called out on the untrue announcement, President Biden proceeds to replicate it.
The water claim is equally untrue and untrue.  The legislation doesn’t prevent people from giving water to those standing based on The legislation allows”self-service water from an unattended receptacle” for voters waiting in line. In addition, it permits everyone to give water or food to some Republicans out of limited region around the polling place. The change in the language followed complaints from the past elections that attempts were circumventing the rules by distributing water and food within the restricted location. This makes no sense to bar people from politicking from the region if they can display the same political identifications in coming people in line for the purpose of giving out free food or drink. If the issue is really for the waiting voters, it shouldn’t matter that the water is dispersed with no political affiliation.

CORRECTION: A previous version of this story explained the new law could limit voting hours. On Election Day at Georgia, polling places are available from 7 a.m. to seven pm, and if you are in line from 7 pm, you are allowed to cast your ballot. Nothing in the new law affects those rules.
On the other hand, the legislation made some modifications to early voting. The bill adds a second compulsory Saturday of early voting to elections but eliminates fourteen days of early retirement before runoffs.

Psaki was faced with Fox News using Biden’s ongoing false statements about the legislation and she continued to double .  At a remarkably disingenuous instant, Psaki reacted”It standardizes the end of voting every day , right? It only provides choices. It provides options to enlarge it, right, however it Measure it . In addition, it makes it that outside groups can’t provide water or food to folks in line, right?”
The points are ridiculous and Psaki knew it. The legislation made compulsory the full day of voting to guarantee those hours while allowing the identical choice of different states to stay open till 7 pm. The change was meant to prevent shorter hours beneath a previous ambiguity in law.
Biden is encouraging a boycott of a state based on untrue assertions about a legislation and the majority of the press is complicit in preserving that false narrative. There are facets to this law which may justify such resistance by maybe not the two primary reasons cited by Biden.
Psaki’s alternative details are now part of an alternative reality being constructed in Washington with the assistance of an empowering media. Schumer insists that at New York”we are working to make it easier, not harder, to vote.” However, New York has some stricter rules compared to those contained in Georgia.  As an instance, there are fewer early retirement days than Georgia and a restriction on passing out food and water 1 in value to voters according to New York also requires an excuse to ask for an absentee ballot.
Therefore, if Georgia has been”Jim Crow on steroids,” what is your New York legislation?
The insistence that this legislation is worse than the Jim Crow legislation would be to interrogate background. The Jim Crow legislation included open and raw racial segregation and discrimination. The defeat of those laws were a defining moment in our battle against racism.
Yet again, there are valid issues to be mentioned on voting procedures, including the effort to federalize election legislation. However, we need to have that discussion with a sincere and true factual foundation. Law professors and commentators who were outspoken in denouncing the false legal claims of this Trump administration are silent today. At exactly the identical time, some like former Clinton adviser Marc Elias are criticized for using atomic arguments to drive the effort against Georgia.
The criticism was in my opinion entirely meritless, but received widespread acclaim.
Psaki isn’t a lawyer but the silence on the defense of those false representations from the President is deafening. Trump made false claims about the size of the inauguration crowd. One would believe the call for precision would be greater in this context.

At exactly the identical time, the Georgia officials (who were lionized for their bravery and ethics in the past election by Democrats) are now being accused for pushing through a set of modifications which are worse than the Jim Crow laws set into place after the Civil War.  Both specific reasons repeatedly cited by the President have been demonstrated to function as gross misrepresentations. However, these”alternative details” fit a narrative that has, once again, found favor at the news. The legislation is worse than Jim Crow because of the political rather than the historical or legal realities.

Like this:Like Loading…